Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Assess the Perception and Acceptance of Treatment for Impaired Fertility among Males attending Infertility Clinic at Selected Hospital in Chennai: A Descriptive Study

Vahitha. S

Abstract


Fertility has been one of men’s desired attributes since the beginning of recorded history and remains a driving need for young couples today. Men are directly responsible for about 30-40% of infertility. One of the most difficult aspects of primary infertility treatment for the couple is to decide when to stop. Because infertility treatment processes often involves repeated therapies and creates further stress and disappointment. Quantitative descriptive approach design was used. 150 men were selected as the study subjects by convenient sampling. The tool used for the study was rating scale and structured questionnaire. This study assessed the perceptions and acceptance of treatment towards the male infertility. There was a positive moderate relationship (p<0.05) between perception and acceptance of treatment by infertile men. The study identifies that the men who are more educated, long period of infertility and more years of treatment are significantly associated with level of perception and the more income, long infertile period and the late marriage are significantly associated with level of acceptance of treatment. The study concluded that majority of the men perceived moderate level of perception but are irregular in accepting the treatment towards the infertility.

Keywords: Impaired fertility, perception, acceptance, demographic variables

Full Text:

PDF

References


Polit and Hungler. Nursing Research Principles & Methods, 8th edition, Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott Publications. (2009)

Philips Celeste R. Family Centered Maternity Newborn Care. 3rd edition, St Louis Mosby New Year Book Publications. 1996.

Rajan, R. Infertility, Gynecology and Obstetrics. (1st edition) New Delhi: Publication of the Indian Academy of Human Reproduction.1999.

Rao, S., P.P. An Introduction to Biostatistics (3rd edition) New Delhi: Practice Hall of India. 2003.

Sabaratnam Arulkumaran & Gopalan Sarala. Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Post Graduates, 3rd Edition, Hyderabad, Orient Longman Publication. 2009.

Shaw .W. Robert & Luesley David. Gynecology, 4th edition, London Churchill Livingstone Publication. 2010

Andrews FM, et al. Stress from Infertility, marriage factors, and subjective well-being of wives and husbands; Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2001; 211–213p.

Benagiano G, et.al (2006); Infertility: a global perspective; Minerva Gynecological Journal.2006; 13: 332–338p.

Beutal, M. et.al. Treatment related Stresses and Depression in couples assisted reproductive treatment. Androlgia. 1999; 31(1).217–35p.

Bovin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Social Science and Medicine. 2003; 124–127p.

Brand. Gender difference in married couples. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1984; 49 (2) 68–70p.

Brutish. Psychological distress and infertility. Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998; 116(4).

Bovin.,J. et al. Reaction to infertility based on extent of treatment failure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995; 63(4). 88–92p.

Davis & Deerman Feeling of loneliness in infertile couples. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology practice. 1991; 25(7). 56–59p.

Duchesne, W.J. Psychological distress and infertility. Asian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecological practice. 1991; 25(4) 110–114p.

Hirsch & Hirsch. Infertility affects women and men differently. Midwifery Journal. 1989; (16) 261–265p.

Jirka,J., Mertha. Loneliness and social support in infertile couples

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology practice. 1986; 25(7).

Sheirer, E.K. Potential association between male infertility and occupational psychological stress. Life line. 2002; (7)2: 220–225p.

Wilson, B. Psycho social effects of infertility. Midwifery Journal. 1991; (18): 215–219p.

Xu L, et al. Psychological aspects of infertile couples. American Journal of Nursing 1991; 48(5): 36–68p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijnspr.v1i1.32

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.