Evidence of Birthing Positions in the Second Stage of Labor
Abstract
The second stage of labor is described as starting with full cervical dilatation (10 cm) and ending
with fetal expulsion. Nulliparous women had a median length of 50 minutes, whereas
multiparous women have a median duration of 20 minutes. For the mother and fetus, as well as
the care providers, the second stage of labor is frequently the most difficult aspect of the birthing
process. The risk of maternal and fetal problems rises as the second stage of labor lasts longer.
For example, postpartum haemorrhage, surgical delivery, third- and fourth-degree laceration,
poor Apgar score, and infant asphyxia-related problems have all been linked to a protracted
second stage of labor or pushing. Maternal and newborn problems that occurred during this time
might be fatal. As a result, in order to organise safe vaginal births, the second stage of labor must
be managed.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ Position in the second stage of labour for women
without epidural anaesthesia.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 5: CD002006.
Thies-Lagergren L. The Swedish birth seat trial. Karolinska Institutet (Sweden); 2013.
Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mother’s
sup SM’III: New Mothers Speak Out. The Journal of Perinatal Education.
;23(1):17.
Edqvist M, Blix E, Hegaard HK Perineal injuries and birth positions among 2992
women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth 2016;16(1):196.
Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for
vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(2).
Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A, Biesty LM. Active versus
expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane database of
systematic reviews. 2019(2): CD007412.
Bolten N, De Jonge A, Zwagerman E, Zwagerman P, Klomp T, Zwart JJ et al. Effect of
planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk
women: a cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC pregnancy and childbirth.
;16(1):1-3.
Pascucci C, Adams E Workplace Aggression in the Perinatal Setting. The Journal of
Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 2017;31(1):3-6.
Deliktas A, Kukulu K. A meta‐analysis of the effect on maternal health of upright
positions during the second stage of labour, without routine epidural analgesia. Journal
of Advanced Nursing. 2018;74(2):263-78.
Moraloglu O, Kansu-Celik H, Tasci Y, Karakaya BK, Yilmaz Y, Cakir E, Yakut HI.
The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second
stage of labor in nulliparous women. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal
Medicine. 2017;30(2):245-9.
Newton N. The fetus ejection reflex revisited. Birth. 1987;14(2):106-8.
Simarro M, Espinosa JA, Salinas C, Ojea R, Salvadores P, Walker C et al. A prospective
randomized trial of postural changes vs passive supine lying during the second stage of
labor under epidural analgesia. Medical Sciences. 2017;5(1):5.
Edqvist M, Hildingsson I, Mollberg M, Lundgren I, Lindgren H. Midwives’
management during the second stage of labor in relation to second‐degree tears—an
experimental study. Birth. 2017;44(1):86-94.
Elvander C, Ahlberg M, Thies-Lagergren L, Cnattingius S, Stephansson O. Birth
position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000
spontaneous births. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015;15(1):1-9.
Walker C, Rodríguez T, Herranz A, Espinosa JA, Sánchez E, Espuña-Pons M.
Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal
trauma. International Urogynecology Journal. 2012;23(9):1249-56.
Serati M, Di Dedda MC, Bogani G, Sorice P, Cromi A, Uccella S, Lapenna M, Soligo
M, Ghezzi F. Position in the second stage of labour and de novo onset of post-partum
urinary incontinence. International urogynecology journal. 2016;27(2):281-6.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstetric analgesia and
anesthesia. Practice Bulletin No. 177. Obstet Gynecol; 2017;129:e73 – e89.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion No. 687:
Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet
Gynecol 2017;129(2):e20-e28.
American College of Nurse‐Midwives; Midwives Alliance of North America; National
Association of Certified Professional Midwives. Supporting healthy and normal
physiologic childbirth: a consensus statement by the American College of
Nurse‐Midwives, Midwives Alliance of North America, and the National Association
of Certified Professional Midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(5):529-32.
Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C, Gordon W, Hannibal D, Vedam S. Outcomes of
care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of
North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. Journal of Midwifery & Women's
Health. 2014;59(1):17-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijin.v8i1.2161
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.