Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Study to assess the knowledge and practice of patients regarding dietary management of peptic ulcer at selected hospitals of Mysore, with a view to develop an information guide sheet

Mrs. Manasa M

Abstract


The study aimed at assessing the knowledge and practice of patients regarding dietary management of peptic ulcer and to associate them with selected demographic variables and to develop an information guide sheet for patients. Peptic ulcers are remitting and relapsing lesions. The prevalence of peptic ulcer disease is worldwide, and the morbidity and mortality of the disease is increasing. It is associated with multifactorial etiology, and results in too many complications. Descriptive survey approach was adopted. The sample for the present study included50 peptic ulcer patients. Purposive sampling technique was employed for the sample selection. A tool consisting of 50 items of structured interview schedule was developed. The data was collected and analyzed. Based on the findings, the information guide sheet was developed. About 52% of the respondents had only inadequate knowledge as compared with 78% of the respondents preferring moderate practice, indicating practice is better than knowledge. There was a significant association between knowledge with age and income (P<0.05), and also between practice and income (P<0.05). The study did indicate non-significant association between knowledge and practice level with gender, education, religion, type of family, residential area, and family history of illness. Overall findings showed that the existing knowledge and practice was found to be 48.7 and 61.5%, respectively, regarding dietary management of peptic ulcer. Patients may improve their knowledge and practice by reading information guide sheet regarding dietary management of peptic ulcer.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Singh DS, Gorkhaly MP, Mishra VN, Gambhir IS, Jain AK, Dixit VK. Upper gastrointestinal lesions in portal hypertension; an endoscopic observation. JAPI. 1996; 44(12): 887.

Smeltzer Suzanne C, Bare Brenda. Medical surgical nursing. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 1015-1021.

Johnsen R, Forde OH, Straume B, Burhol PG. An etiology of peptic ulcer. A prospective population study in Norway. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 1995 Apr; 49(2): 224.

Mohan Harsh. Test book of pathology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee brothers; 2003. p. 563-568.

De Boer WA, Joosen EA. Disease management in ulcer disease. S. Chand Journal Gastroenterology. 1999; 23(17): 23-8.

Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research, principles and methods. 6thed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 2005. p. 117

Hazra B, Hazra J. Epidemiology of peptic ulcer in North India. Indian journal Public Health.1998; 42(4): 100-2.

Rosenstock SJ, Jorgensen T, Bonnevie O, Anderse LP. Does H.Pylori infection explain all socio-economic differences in peptic ulcer incidence? Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep; 39(9): 823-9.

Kalaiselvi D. Asses the knowledge of adults regarding peptic ulcer in selected Siyathalab area i.e. ward 12 of Raichur. Msc(N) thesis. RGUHS; 2005.

Karima TM, Bukhari SZ, Ghais MA, Fatani MI, Hussain WM. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer diseases. Saudi Med J. 2006 May; 27(5): 621-6


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.